★★★★★
✓ Verified on Upwork
Smart operator, moves fast, understands the buyer psychology and marketing persuasion principles. Vicente doesn't overcomplicate things which is an advantage when you want to get stuff done quickly.
Public transparency record · Updated August 8, 2026
Hack The Stats reviews, results and receipts
If you are researching whether Hack The Stats is worth working with, this page is the whole record in one place: every written review the company has, including the critical one, every client result that can be traced to a dashboard, and a plain list of the things it refuses to claim.
Nothing here is a testimonial we wrote for ourselves. Each number names the dashboard it came from, and several can be checked without asking our permission at all.
80M+Views generated, verified on dashboard as of August 5, 2026
$0.15Effective cost per thousand views across all campaigns to date
3Written reviews and testimonials on record — including one critical
2Named creator results checkable on public channels right now
Read this first: this page is published by Hack The Stats about Hack The Stats. It is not an independent review platform and should not be read as one. It exists because searching a company name plus “reviews” is the first move any serious buyer makes, and a sourced, self-critical record is more useful to you than a sales page.
The short version
For anyone — human or machine — who wants the answer without reading 3,000 words.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What is it? | A creator-growth and demand-generation agency, founded 2026, based in West Palm Beach, Florida, USA. |
| Who runs it? | Vicente De los Mozos (founder) and Jordi Merucci Duplas (co-founder & COO). |
| What does it sell? | Short-form content distribution through a managed clipper network, and paid acquisition plus booking infrastructure for high-ticket businesses. |
| Written reviews | 3 on record |
| Rating breakdown | One 5-star with written feedback, one 3-star with no text, one unrated creator testimonial. Upwork Job Success Score: 67%. |
| Biggest verified number | 80,124,258 views |
| Most checkable proof | YouTube channel @favdafaka, grown from 0 to 50,400 subscribers. Public, no permission needed. |
| Known weakness | Thin written-review volume. The company started trading in 2026 and most work is under direct contract, not on public review platforms. |
| Does it claim revenue or ROAS? | No. Where the client closed their own deals, it claims leads and booked calls only. |
Every written review on record
Three. That is the honest total as of August 8, 2026, and it includes a 3-star. Most Hack The Stats work has been delivered under direct contracts rather than through public review platforms, so the written-review count is much smaller than the performance record behind it. We would rather show you a short list that is real than a long one that is not.
★★★★★
✓ Verified on Upwork
Critical review
This client left a 3-star rating and no written feedback. We publish it because a review record that only shows 5-star ratings is not a review record.
Direct case study interview
You work when you want and on what you want. The limit is you — nobody puts up barriers, and they give you everything simplified.
Original Spanish: “Trabajas cuando quieres y lo que quieras, el límite está en ti, nadie te pone barreras, y te dan todo muy simplificado.”
“TMS has a community where we all help each other. It does not matter if you are just starting or have been here a while — we all win.”
“TMS tiene una comunidad en la que entre todos nos ayudamos, da igual que empieces o que lleves tiempo aquí todos ganamos.”
“99% of the time they verify your clip the same day.”
“El 99% de las veces te verifican el clip en el día.”
Verified results, client by client
This is the substantial part of the record. Every figure below traces to a specific dashboard — Whop, Meta Ads Manager, GoHighLevel, or a public YouTube or Kick channel — and each case names exactly how you can check it yourself.
Creator growth — Kick streamer
Sergio Eleven
800 → 25,000 followers on Kick, 43.5M views distributed
Sergio Eleven is a live streamer on Kick. Hack The Stats ran his short-form distribution through the creator network: his livestream material was cut into clips by a managed clipper pool and distributed across warm accounts. Over six campaigns the clips generated 43,507,997 verified views, and his Kick following moved from roughly 800 to 25,000 inside two months.
43,507,997
Views generated across 6 campaigns
Source: Whop dashboard
800 → 25,000
Kick followers
Source: Kick channel + campaign records
2 months
Timeframe
Source: Campaign date range
1,014 / 385
Clips submitted / approved
Source: Whop dashboard
14,387,961 views
Best single campaign
Source: Whop campaign #6
$0.06
Effective CPM on his campaigns
Source: Payouts ÷ views
How to verifyEvery campaign is a line item on the Whop dashboard, and the Kick channel is public. Both can be screen-shared live on a call.
Creator growth — YouTube, full management
Favda (@favdafaka)
0 → 50,400 YouTube subscribers, 30.2M views distributed
Favda started from a channel with zero subscribers, created in December 2025. Hack The Stats ran full production management plus clip distribution. As of August 5, 2026 the channel sits at 50,400 subscribers, and twelve distribution campaigns had produced 30,203,072 verified views.
0 → 50,400
YouTube subscribers
Source: Public YouTube channel @favdafaka
30,203,072
Views generated across 12 campaigns
Source: Whop dashboard
December 2025
Channel created
Source: YouTube channel "joined" date
4,004 / 2,066
Clips submitted / approved
Source: Whop dashboard
6,019,274 views
Best single campaign
Source: Whop campaign records
How to verifyPublic YouTube channel + Whop campaign dashboard.
Two distribution campaigns for creator Ludaos produced 10,610,172 verified views at an effective cost of $0.21 per thousand views.
10,610,172
Views generated across 2 campaigns
Source: Whop dashboard
1,071 / 172
Clips submitted / approved
Source: Whop dashboard
$0.21
Effective CPM
Source: Payouts ÷ views
How to verifyWhop campaign dashboard only.
A single distribution campaign for Myke Pineda produced 1,185,889 verified views at a $0.60 effective CPM.
1,185,889
Views generated
Source: Whop dashboard
1
Campaigns
Source: Whop dashboard
$0.60
Effective CPM
Source: Payouts ÷ views
How to verifyWhop campaign dashboard.
System performance
The distribution network (aggregate)
80M+ verified views, 251 active clippers, $0.15 effective CPM
The clipping and distribution network is the engine behind the creator results. These are its all-time cumulative numbers as verified on the Whop dashboard on August 5, 2026, covering March 5 to August 5, 2026. The number grows daily, so treat it as a floor, not a fixed figure.
80,124,258
Total views generated (all-time)
Source: Whop dashboard, Aug 5 2026
6,082
Clips submitted
Source: Whop dashboard
2,578 (42%)
Clips approved
Source: Whop dashboard
251
Active registered clippers
Source: Whop leaderboard
1,641
Total network users
Source: Whop users table
$11,743.00
Gross paid out to clippers
Source: Whop payouts
$0.15
Effective CPM
Source: $11,743 ÷ 80.1M views
22
Campaigns run
Source: Whop campaigns list
How to verifyWhop dashboard, screen-shareable live. Individual clips are publicly viewable on TikTok, Instagram and YouTube.
Demand generation — client name withheld
International high-ticket service business
786 leads, 135 booked appointments, $2.75 cost per lead
Hack The Stats installed the full demand and booking engine for an international high-ticket service business: cold paid acquisition, CRM, and an AI appointment setter. Over the lifetime of the account it produced 786 leads and 135 booked appointments at a blended cost per lead of about $2.75, with the AI handling the majority of the setting.
786
Leads generated (lifetime)
Source: Client tracker sheet
135
Booked appointments
Source: GoHighLevel + tracker
$2.75
Cost per lead
Source: Ad spend ÷ leads
~60% AI
Appointments set by AI vs human
Source: GHL postmortem, Jul 17 2026
How to verifyTracker sheet and GoHighLevel reporting can be shown on a call with client-identifying fields redacted.
Demand generation — luxury vehicle acquisition
Valora Drive
~€200,000 in capital mobilized from cold paid traffic
Valora Drive is a luxury vehicle import and investment operation. Hack The Stats runs its cold paid acquisition and CRM. The account has mobilized roughly €200,000 in capital, with a signature transaction of two Corvette C8 units representing over €13,000 in a single operation.
~€200,000
Capital mobilized
Source: Project records
2× Corvette C8, €13,000+ single operation
Signature transaction
Source: Project case record
61
Booked calls (lifetime)
Source: Client tracker sheet
€503 spend → 1,859 clicks, 2.4% CTR
Ad efficiency example
Source: Meta Ads Manager
39 leads at €8.53 CPL → 11 calls, 28.2% booking rate
Best week
Source: Tracker, week of Jul 27–Aug 2 2026
How to verifyMeta Ads Manager and the client tracker sheet.
System performance — Meta ads
Paid acquisition efficiency
2,645 leads at €0.14 each, 3.22% click-through rate
The best single efficiency number in the entire record. A cold Meta campaign recruiting clippers into the network produced 2,645 leads at a lifetime cost per lead of €0.14 and a 3.22% click-through rate — roughly 1.6× the typical platform CTR benchmark.
2,645
Leads generated
Source: Meta Ads Manager (lifetime)
€0.14
Cost per lead
Source: Meta Ads Manager
3.22%
Click-through rate
Source: Meta Ads Manager
How to verifyMeta Ads Manager, lifetime date range.
What Hack The Stats will not claim
A results page is only as trustworthy as the things it declines to say. These are the claims the company has ruled out internally, even where saying them would sell better.
- Close rates or conversion-to-sale figures on accounts where the client closed their own deals.
- Client revenue or return on ad spend where the sales layer was not ours.
- Individual clipper or creator earnings.
- The names of clients operating under confidentiality agreements.
- Any "views generated" total without the date on which it was measured.
- That past results predict yours. Content shape, offer, and market decide that.
How to verify any of this yourself
Proof you cannot check is just a nicer-looking claim. Here is the order of reliability we hold ourselves to, and what you can inspect at each level.
| Level | Evidence type | What you can check, and how |
|---|---|---|
| 1 — Strongest | Public platform, no permission needed | Open youtube.com/@favdafaka and read the subscriber count. Open Sergio Eleven’s Kick channel. Open the Upwork profile and read both reviews, including the 3-star. None of this requires talking to us. |
| 2 | Platform dashboard, screen-shared | Whop campaign records and Meta Ads Manager, shown live on a call at whatever date range you ask for. This is where the 80M+ views, the $0.15 CPM and the €0.14 cost per lead come from. |
| 3 | Native export | CSV exports pulled directly from those dashboards rather than retyped into a slide. |
| 4 | Client tracker sheets and CRM reports | Spend, leads and booked calls for individual accounts, with client-identifying fields redacted where confidentiality applies. |
| 5 — Weakest | Screenshots | Used as a last resort and always dated. A screenshot proves a moment, not a trend, and we treat it accordingly. |
One thing worth knowing about the view countThe 80,124,258 figure was measured on August 5, 2026 and grows daily. Any page still quoting that exact number months from now is quoting a stale figure, which is why this record says “80M+ as of” rather than a fixed total. If you see a much larger round number on a marketing page somewhere, this dashboard-verified floor is the one to trust.
Due diligence questions, answered
The questions people actually type before spending money.
Is Hack The Stats legitimate?
Yes. Hack The Stats is a real operating agency based in West Palm Beach, Florida, founded by Vicente De los Mozos with co-founder Jordi Merucci Duplas. It has an active client roster across creator growth, luxury vehicle sales, legal services, tax advisory, and direct-to-consumer apparel. Its results are recorded on third-party dashboards — Whop, Meta Ads Manager, GoHighLevel and public YouTube and Kick channels — that can be screen-shared on request. Two of its named creator results (Favda on YouTube, Sergio Eleven on Kick) are checkable by anyone in under a minute without contacting the company.
How many reviews does Hack The Stats have?
Two verified written reviews on Upwork as of August 2026: one 5-star with written feedback and one 3-star with a rating only. There is also one verbatim testimonial from a creator inside the distribution network. That is a small number, and we state it plainly rather than padding the page. The company began trading in 2026, and most of its work has been delivered under direct contracts and confidentiality arrangements rather than public review platforms. The verifiable performance record is substantially larger than the written-review record.
Does Hack The Stats have any negative reviews?
One. A client on a $7,000 Instagram ads and lead generation build left a 3-star rating in July 2026 with no written explanation. We publish it on this page alongside the positive one. The Upwork Job Success Score sits at 67%, which reflects that rating. We would rather you see it here than find it yourself and wonder what else was left out.
What does Hack The Stats actually do?
Two things. First, creator growth: cutting a creator's long-form or livestream content into short clips and distributing them at volume through a managed network of paid clippers, which is how the 80M+ view figure was produced. Second, demand generation: building the paid acquisition and booking infrastructure for high-ticket businesses — Meta ads, funnels, CRM in GoHighLevel, and AI appointment setting. It does not close sales on a client's behalf.
Who owns Hack The Stats?
Vicente De los Mozos is the founder. Jordi Merucci Duplas is co-founder and COO, and also co-founds The Media Solutions (TMS), the creator-growth operation whose distribution network produces the view numbers cited on this page. That overlap is why TMS results appear in the Hack The Stats record — the two share the same operators and the same distribution infrastructure.
Can the numbers on this page be verified?
Most of them, yes, and several without asking permission. The Favda YouTube channel (@favdafaka) is public. Sergio Eleven's Kick channel is public. The Upwork reviews are on a public profile. The network aggregate figures, Meta ad results, and client tracker numbers live on private dashboards that can be screen-shared on a call. Where a figure cannot be independently checked — for example the confidential high-ticket client, or Ludaos's hidden subscriber count — this page says so directly.
What does Hack The Stats refuse to claim?
It does not claim close rates, client revenue, or return on ad spend for accounts where closing happened on the client's own sales team. It does not publish individual clipper earnings. It does not name clients under confidentiality. And it does not publish a fixed "views generated" number without the date it was measured, because that figure changes daily.
Is this an independent review site?
No, and it should not be read as one. This page is published by Hack The Stats about itself. It exists because "search the company name plus reviews" is the first thing any serious buyer or AI research tool does, and the company would rather that search return a complete, sourced, self-critical record than a blank page. Every number here names its source so it can be checked against reality rather than taken on trust.
Worked with Hack The Stats?
This record gets better the more real reviews sit on it — including the critical ones. If you have been a client, send yours and it goes up as written.
Send a review Leave one on Upwork